Vance won on performance, Walz won on substance and relatability. He effectively invoked the specter of Vance overseeing elector certification on January 6th, 2028. (I recorded Nixon’s press conferences on cassette tape in the 1970s. Ancient nerd here.)
I think Vance came off better in on screen charisma, but Walz was more solid in his explanations and clarifying policy platforms. However, to the uninitiated, my worry is that they'll take Vance's confidence as the qualifier for the points he was making and taking it as gold.
Vance won on performance, Walz won on substance and relatability. He effectively invoked the specter of Vance overseeing elector certification on January 6th, 2028. (I recorded Nixon’s press conferences on cassette tape in the 1970s. Ancient nerd here.)
I think Vance came off better in on screen charisma, but Walz was more solid in his explanations and clarifying policy platforms. However, to the uninitiated, my worry is that they'll take Vance's confidence as the qualifier for the points he was making and taking it as gold.